10.10 Children who Harm Other Children

Severe harm may be caused to children by the abusive and bullying behaviour of other children, which may be of a physical, sexual or emotional nature.

The effect on the victim of intimidation and peer pressure by their abuser may make disclosure difficult for the victim.

Bullying is a common form of deliberately hurtful behaviour, usually repeated over a period of time, where it is difficult for the victims to defend themselves. It can take many forms, but the three main types are physical (e.g. hitting, kicking, theft), verbal (e.g. racist or homophobic / religious remarks, threats, name calling) and emotional (e.g. isolating an individual from social activities, cyberbullying).

The damage inflicted by bullying is often underestimated and can cause considerable distress to children to the extent that it affects their health and development. In the extreme it can cause Significant Harm, including self-harm.

Bullying may involve an allegation of crime (assault, theft, harassment) and this must be reported to the police at the earliest opportunity.

Schools are required to have policies to combat bullying and in the first instance cases should be dealt with under such policies. The Government's guidance for schools on tackling bullying, Safe to learn, is available on the Department for Education website. The Department for Education has also published a report outlining anti-bullying tactics employed by schools - Approaches to preventing and tackling bullying.

For information about tackling bullying in other settings, please see the Safe from Bullying suite of guidance on the Department for Education website.

When there is suspicion or an allegation of a child having been sexually abused or being likely to sexually abuse another child, it should be referred immediately to Children's Social Care or the Police - see Making a Referral Procedure.

When considering whether sexual abuse has occurred, it is important to determine what is developmentally normal sexual experimentation and what is coercive (see also Sexually Active Children Procedure).

Concerns about possible abuse by one child of another are frequently first considered within a school environment and it may frequently be unclear if the circumstances should be considered under child protection procedures or not.

Where it is clear that the concern is one of child protection there should be no delay in the referral to Children's Social Care e.g. disclosure or witnessing of Sexual Abuse.

Where further assessment is required prior to deciding the extent and nature of the concerns, the school should:

• Ensure the parents / guardian of both the victim and the alleged perpetrator(s) are advised and invited to be present when the children are interviewed formally;
• Provide pupils with the opportunity to record or dictate in their own words their version of events;
• Consider any need to separate the alleged victim and perpetrator in the classroom, in the school and the possible need to send one or both home;
• Not interview either child on their own after the preliminary interview following disclosure - they should be accompanied by a parent or guardian;
• Keep a written record of pertinent information including date, time, those present and signature - a diagram / photo of the room / playground may be useful, as well as a description of who was present etc;
• Provide the child with the opportunity to confirm the accuracy of the record and record any disagreement.

Professionals must decide in the circumstances of each case whether or not behaviour directed at another child should be categorised as abusive or not. It will be helpful to consider the following factors:

• Relative chronological and developmental age of the two children (the greater the difference, the more likely the behaviour should be defined as abusive);
• A differential in power or authority (e.g. related to race or physical or intellectual vulnerability of the victim);
• Actual behaviour (both physical and verbal factors must be considered);
• Whether the behaviour could be described as age appropriate or involves inappropriate sexual knowledge or motivation;
• Physical aggression, bullying or bribery;
• The victim's experience and perception of the behaviour;
• The possibility the abuser is, or was, also a victim;
• Attempts to ensure secrecy;
• An assessment of the change in the behaviour over time (whether it has become more severe or more frequent);
• Duration and frequency of behaviour.

Where it is clear that the concern is one of child protection there should be no delay in the referral to Children's Social Care - see the Making a Referral Procedure.

The interests of the identified victim must always be the paramount consideration. However, whenever a child may have abused another, all agencies must be aware of their responsibilities to both individuals, and multi-agency management of the case must reflect this.

It is likely that the abuser may pose a significant risk of harm to other children, have considerable needs themselves and may also be or have been the victim of abuse. The interests of any such children must also be considered as part of the response to the referral and in the multi agency management of the case.

In all cases where the suspected abuser is a young person, the Police and Children's Social Care must convene a Strategy Discussion (usually a face-to-face meeting) within the Section 47 Enquiry time-scales. The Police will also decide whether a criminal offence is alleged.

Where the decision is reached that the alleged behaviour does not constitute abuse or the child is under the age of criminal responsibility, and there is no need for further enquiry or criminal investigation, the details of the referral and the reasons for the decision must be recorded.

When the young people concerned are the responsibility of different local authorities, each must be represented at the Strategy Discussion, which will usually be convened and chaired by the authority in which the victim lives.

The Strategy Discussion must consider the needs of both children, as well as any other children who may be at risk from the alleged perpetrator. Best practice would be for separate meetings to be convened for the victim/others at risk and the alleged abuser.

A different social worker should be allocated for the victim and the abuser, even when they live in the same household, to ensure that both are supported through the process of the enquiry and that both their needs are fully assessed.

The Strategy Discussion will be convened and chaired by Children's Social Care and a record made.

The following individuals should be invited to the meeting:

• Social worker for the child who is suspected or alleged to have abused another person;
• Social worker for the child alleged to have been abused;
• Social workers' first line manager(s);
• Police;
• YOT representative where the alleged abuser is aged ten or over;
• School representatives (particularly if the concerns suggest that other children in the school setting may have been or may be at risk of being abused);
• School nurse or other health services staff as required;
• Representatives of fostering or residential care as applicable;
• LEA lead officer.

The Strategy Discussion must plan in detail the respective roles of those involved in enquiries and ensure the following objectives are met:

• Information relevant to the protection needs of the alleged victim (and any other child or children who may be at risk) is gathered;
• Any criminal aspects of the abuse are investigated;
• Any information relevant to any abusive experiences and protection needs of the alleged perpetrator are gathered.

In planning the investigation the following factors should be considered:

• Age of both children and any other child or children who may be at risk;
• Seriousness of the alleged incident;
• Effect on the victim and their own view of their safety;
• Parental attitude and ability to protect their child;
• Arrangements to protect the victim and other children, especially where the victim and alleged perpetrator are in the same household or school class;
• Whether there is suspicion that the alleged abuser has also been abused;
• Whether there is reason to suspect that adults are also involved;
• The likelihood and desirability of criminal prosecutions taking place.

Where there is suspicion that the child is both an abuser and the victim of abuse, the Strategy Discussion must consider the order in which interviews will take place.

The conduct of any investigation will be discussed within a Strategy Discussion and the interview planning meeting to ensure the requirements of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) 1984 and Achieving Best Evidence  (ABE) are met.

Practice reminder: If the child gives a clear disclosure to the first responder (e.g. a teacher) then there is no need for Police taking a first account (Q&A). Police are able to go straight to an Achieving Best Evidence (ABE) interview that has an intermediary to support the child and is fully child focused.  The child should not, and does not have to repeat the disclosure to the police before an ABE interview.

Where police decide to conduct a separate 'offender' interview, Children's Social Care will not normally be involved other than in performing any statutory responsibilities to the child e.g. as Appropriate Adult.

Throughout the enquiry, the immediate protection of the child(ren) must be ensured if that is necessary.

The outcome of enquiries is as described in the Section 47 Enquiries Procedure.

However, the position of the alleged victim(s) and the alleged perpetrator must be considered separately.

If the information gathered in the course of enquiries suggests that the perpetrator is also a victim, or potential victim, of abuse including neglect, a Child Protection Conference must be convened.

Where there are no grounds for a Child Protection Conference, but concerns remain regarding the child's sexually abusive behaviour, (s)he will be considered as a Child In Need. In such cases, a multi-agency planning meeting should be held.

Consideration should be given to inviting a youth offending team representative to the conference of alleged abusers aged 10 or over, and informing YOT of the meeting in the case of younger children.

As well as carrying out all of its normal functions the Child Protection Conference must consider how to respond to the child's needs as a possible abuser.

Where the alleged perpetrator is not subject to a Child Protection Plan, consideration should be given to the need for services to address any abusive behaviour and the multi-agency responsibility to manage any risk, through the use of multi-agency planning meetings.

The decision as to how to proceed with the criminal aspects of a case will be made by the Police and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). This decision will take into account any recommendations of the youth offending team and the views of other professionals.

Best practice suggests that criminal proceedings should not be taken where:

• Criminalising certain types of behaviour may be detrimental to the interests of all concerned;
• It is inappropriate to pursue the criminal aspects of the case because the professionals are satisfied that sexual activity took place but that it was not abusive.

Where there are insufficient grounds for holding a Child Protection Conference, or where one has been held but the child is not subject of a Child Protection Plan as a result, a multi-agency approach will still be needed if the young abuser's needs are complex.

In such cases a multi-agency planning meeting should be convened by Children's Social Care to pool information, allocate roles and set a time-table for an assessment of the needs of the child and the risk posed by them, as well as to coordinate any other interim intervention.

Those invited should include participants of the Strategy Discussion and representatives from health (including child and adolescent mental health services), school and any other appropriate service provider, the child and her/his parents / carers.

In cases where the young abuser is also Looked After, consideration should be given to the need for a plan to minimise risk of future offending, agreed with the child's carers and their agency.

On completion of the assessment, the same forum will be reconvened to consider the outcome, to identify a Lead Professional and the roles of relevant agencies in providing any identified intervention, including specialist input with regard to young people with special needs.

This may include action to address the risk posed to other children in contact with the alleged abuser as well as the identified victim.

Care must be taken to provide services culturally appropriate to the needs of the child and the family.

Intervention should be reviewed at regular multi-agency meetings at intervals of no more than six months.

At the point of closure, the review will consider the possible need for long-term monitoring and the availability of advice and other services.

Young people with inappropriate sexual behaviour who may pose a risk to children with whom they have contact or who are re-entering the community following a custodial sentence or time in secure accommodation, or who move into an area from another local authority also require such a multi-agency assessment / intervention -Section 9 of this manual, Risk Management of Known Offenders and Those who Pose a Risk.